In Danny's and T.R.'s townhomes The Rosemary Acers there are a lot of rules icluding the no pets rule and when thier friend Paul ttries to hide a cat who walked 15 miles from his previous owner to get to him and then the troulbes begin while T.R. and Danny wacthes the babes house and visits there father while still trying to keep the secret. One specific part I didn't like was how much they talked about women naked and through underwear drawers.Did I really need to know that?When I started reading this book I didn't think it would be this kind of stuff in it.I also didn't like how much they drooled over Mickey all the time. I would reccomend this book to people who want to know what a garter belt is because you will find out.Also if you are a boy there is a lot of stuuf in here about women in here. there all things in here from animals to suprising enndings.I didn't really like this book to well but other peolple might find it funny.

I am sorry but this is not the type of book I expected to find when I bought it (I could not see the contents previously). This is not a book about the Essentials of Behavioral Assessment, this is a book talking about some questionnaires for children. Very frustrating! I suggest the authors or publisher to change urgently the title of the book. I think it is not fair calling this book "Essentials of Behavioral Assessment"!

The portfolios presented here are no different than the characters you create for your own campaign. It has a convenience factor if you don't have time to do your own NPCs, but that's about it. Paradoxical juxtapositions show how characters can often be conflicted (a tiefling paladin is not much of a stretch, though), but this will come as no surprise to those already familiar D&D. There are better buys out there.

This is poorly written, inadequately researched, indifferently edited, book passing itself off as scholarship. In keeping with its topic--this is sociology lite. Go read something with more nutritious substance.

This book is poorly written, inaccurate and misleading. I am not talking about the occasional, minor inaccuracy, but incessant and blatant fallacies page after page after page. At one point, the authors suggest that one might buy a GH puppy, train it and then take it to the track and race it! The reality is that dogs are raced by large kennels that have contractual agreements with tracks to operate there. Unlike in some foreign countries, individual Americans cannot operate a single dog or handful of dogs. No distinction is made between the AKC Greyhound (a show dog) and the NGA GH (the racer). The authors stated that GHs are usually a solid color. Yet if one merely looks at the photos of the dogs in the book, it would be easy to see that most dogs are a combination of colors, often brindled. At one point, the authors say that Salukis are the swiftest of the sighthounds -- if that were true, then there would be Saluki racing instead of GH racing. I have personally seen GHs and Salukis run side-by-side at lure coursing practice and there is no comparison. This is an awful book that seems to have been written entirely on rumor, heresay and supposition. Don't buy it. If you did buy it, burn it.

The inclusion of Victor Hugo's name and title on the cover is misleading, implying a parallel French/English text. This is an adaptation in verse which moves the setting to London. It's well realized, but if you are looking for the original play, you will be disappointed.

Yawn- if you're serious about star wars, most of this stuff you already know. You can find out everything that's really good to know in this book from reading X-Wing Rogue Squadron, and have some fun besides. Skip this dull bite-sized tome and get a science textbook. It would be more fun.